![]() ![]() The people that believe they would have a better idea than the normal course of due diligence their legal team exercises should keep their helmets nice and snug when they go out in public. It is absolutely inane to suggest that their legal team is not smart enough to pick up what some momo with a microphone or keyboard posting in a public forum has 'discovered'. Well, yeah, but what would be a reason? What kind of logical argument can be made in support of some random person with an idea that holds more value than the simple understood concept that PayPal obviously ran it by their legal team and reached a conclusion. it could really messed up Global's business model (true) The fact that they wrote such a wordy piece of garbage with all kinds of loopholes does not conflate to anything close to being wrong by Global, Fan Duel, ClubWPT, or any other sweeps model.Ĭ) using a 3rd party payment processors is sketchy and expensive, so if PayPal quits allowing trans. ![]() They are operating inside the guidelines set forth by the clowns in DC. The law is written clearly and they are not even coming close to crossing a line by their business model.ī) Global Poker is operating in a grey area using their sweepstakes model (true)įalse. You are buying gold coins, which have no value and not making a deposit. True, but you are not gambling, by definition of law, on Global poker so the statement has no value. A) PayPal is against gambling transactions (true) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |